Doughnuts to celebrate our not-first-day of school.
It's literally impossible to get all four kids looking at the camera at the same time.
All the reasons I listed for homeschooling in my original post still hold true, but having now completed two years (and four weeks!) of public school, I thought it was worth expanding on my reasons for returning to homeschooling. (Now is a good time to warn you that I am incapable of brevity in writing and always have been. I really did try, though!).
I should begin by stating that I am not a hardcore homeschooler. Yes, I love it. Yes, I think it's a great option. No, I don't think it's the BEST option for everyone, everywhere, all the time. There are benefits and drawbacks to both options. But I AM a hardcore proponent of each family being able to make the choice that is best for them. I've been disappointed both by public school parents who think homeschoolers are unsocialized weirdos and by homeschooling parents who think public schoolers are all getting a terrible education. Both are exaggerations. As is true in many circumstances, we could all benefit from a little more willingness to respect differences in opinion, whether we personally agree or not.
I also need to make it very clear that this decision has nothing to do with the quality of the teachers my children had. We are lucky to attend one of the best schools in our county and it shows. I loved every single one of their teachers: they were intelligent, dedicated, and enthusiastic. And they were still like that even after spending an entire school year with my kids! I'm grateful for teachers who love their jobs and who have helped my kids love learning.
So if it's not the teachers, what IS my issue? As best as I can describe it, it's the path that American public schools are increasingly taking. It wasn't until a combination of seemingly small issues snowballed together that I decided to homeschool again.
The Black Hole
The very first thing I noticed about public school was the complete lack of communication. As a homeschooler I was used to knowing everything Seth was learning. Obviously I wasn't expecting that kind of knowledge from his teachers but I was unprepared for complete silence. Sure, he had a bit of homework. Yes, I went to meet with his teacher at the beginning of the year. But I had no idea what he was doing for science. What books he was reading. What kind of grammar he was learning. If he was struggling. If he was bored. I'm sure the school would have contacted me eventually if Seth was really losing it, but I wanted more. I wanted to be able to supplement, to help him understand things on a broader or deeper level. But I never had the chance. School was a giant black hole: Seth went in every morning but no information ever came out. To be fair, Catherine's kindergarten teacher was great about this. We got weekly and monthly updates and I loved it. So I guess we're at a 25% communications rate.Unsocialized Public Schoolers
Our primary reason for sending Seth to public school was to make friends. We had just moved to a new neighborhood and we figured school would be a great way for him to find kids living nearby. We were wrong. This is primarily because many (most?) of the kids in our neighborhood have two working parents, meaning most kids are in both before and after school care. There may be kids around but we rarely see them.But at least there would be friends at school, right? One of the criticisms homeschoolers like to toss at the public schools is the absurdity of artificially placing kids in classrooms based on birth year. When does that happen anywhere else in the "real world"? But it is good for one thing: lots of potential buddies.
Unfortunately, it's really hard to make friends when you have exactly ONE recess a day. One recess that lasts for all of 20 minutes. Yes, even for the kindergartners. Assigned seats in the classroom. Assigned seats at lunch. Assigned seats on the bus. Makes it hard to find many friends if you don't happen to be assigned to sit next to them. All that "socialization" everyone worries so much about with homeschoolers didn't seem to be very impressive in the public school setting.
Recess? What Recess?
The lack of recess time kills me. I assumed elementary school kids would have at least two, hopefully three recesses a day. That's what I had growing up and what many schools still do (mostly out west it seems, based on very scientific anecdotal evidence). Despite the mountains of research that recess actually raises test scores, my kids were stuck with 20 minutes. The worst part is (at least in 2nd and 3rd grade), that recess happened at 2:40 pm. The bus arrives at 8:15 am. For over 6 hours, kids are expected to sit, keep their voices down, and focus. Sounds realistic, right? I can't decide who to feel more sorry for: the students or the poor teachers trying to teach kids who just need a break.What's even worse is how frequently the school decides to cancel recess. Did it rain in the past 12 hours? No recess. Does it look like it might rain? No recess. Too hot? No recess. Too chilly? No recess. Some kid in class doesn't have a jacket and it's a little cool outside? No recess.
No Siblings Allowed
I realize that our four-child family is an anomaly in a world of families with 1.8 children. I still think it's hilarious that we are considered a "large" family when I grew up thinking four kids was right around average (thank you, Mormon families!). But it seems that as people have fewer children, children are welcomed in fewer places. Even in places you would expect to see children. For example: a school.
I remember my mom bringing my baby sister to my school while she helped in the classroom. It was a brief distraction when they would walk in, but class quickly resumed as usual. My mom was very careful not to let my sister do anything that would interrupt the teaching environment. So were all the other moms who did the same thing in all the other classrooms. The best part was when they were there during lunch and I got to show off my sister to my friends.
My little ones are not allowed at school. They can't see their older siblings' classrooms. They can't attend their assemblies. They can't even attend their field days or outdoor class parties. No fun lunch dates with big brother and sister at school. If Catherine has a part in a class play, Aaron and Elise can't come watch her. Not even nursing infants. My friend was actually turned away in tears from a nearby school for daring to bring her nursing infant to watch her daughter in a class play. "Find a babysitter" is their response. And a wet nurse? Where do I find one of those?
When I complain about this, I get two responses. The first is always liability issues. I guess I have a hard time understanding how adding my two little ones into a building that is literally full of children could possibly increase liability. But second (and I feel, more honestly), they tell me that they want the focus to be on the child at school. Siblings are a distraction. Guess what? Any time I tell my kids that I'm coming to school, their first question is "Are you bringing Elise?" They're DYING to show off their baby sister to their teachers and friends. It makes them feel like a celebrity. So tell me again why siblings aren't allowed?
As a parent, this hits hard in two areas. The first is my wallet. I had to pay for four babysitting sessions during the last weeks of school so I could attend various assemblies and parties. That gets expensive fast. The second is my sense of community. I WANT to volunteer. I WANT to get to know the faculty. I WANT to feel like we're all one big happy family working together for our children. But because I have two little ones at home and don't have the means to pay for constant babysitting, I don't. I see my kids' teachers a handful of times during a year. My younger children have no good memories of seeing their siblings' fun classrooms or teachers. They have no desire to attend this strange place that only lets them get as far as the front desk. How do I foster an enthusiasm for something they're forbidden from attending until the first day of kindergarten?
Raise Those Test Scores!
I hate standardized tests. Loathe them. And this is why:"A typical student [in the United States] takes 112 mandated standardized tests between pre-kindergarten classes and 12th grade, a new Council of the Great City Schools study found. By contrast, most countries that outperform the United States on international exams test students three times during their school careers" (emphasis added).I could support three tests during their thirteen or so school years. I do understand the need for an accurate measurement tool across the line. But starting in third grade here kids take one or two standardized tests EVERY YEAR. They lose two or more weeks of teaching in order to take these tests. And the rest of the school year is spent making sure test scores will be high because so much (funding, teacher evaluations) depends on these scores. Basically, it's all for the test. The test is why my kids' school swapped to a new reading-heavy math curriculum: it was developed by the same people who write the tests, therefore it must lead to better test scores! Who cares that these curricula and tests are probably not written with appropriate grade-level language? I am not opposed to testing. I am, however, opposed to making sure every bit of learning that happens in a classroom revolves around the topics that will appear on the test.
Unnatural Learning
If I had to pick just one reason for my disaffection with public schooling, it would be this: there's no room for the individual. You're a fourth grader who's already mastered decimals? Too bad: you have to sit through class with everyone else (and get in trouble for not paying attention). You're a fourth grader who still hasn't mastered those multiplication tables? Better pick it up quickly: we have to keep to the schedule for the year. We can't afford to slow down the rest of the class for one student. Or say you're a sixth grader who finds herself enthralled during a brief introduction to coding during computer class. Sorry--take up that hobby on your own time! There is so much that has to be covered: how can the classroom accommodate those students who want to delve more deeply into a subject than just the two class periods allotted on the schedule?
Seth is an excellent reader. He always has been. He loves reading and has great comprehension of what he's read. When it came time to separate the kids into reading levels, he was placed in the top group, which was exactly where he needed to be.
Seth is an excellent reader. He always has been. He loves reading and has great comprehension of what he's read. When it came time to separate the kids into reading levels, he was placed in the top group, which was exactly where he needed to be.
Until he got kicked out. Not for a lack of reading skills. Not for poor comprehension. Because of his writing. It should come as no surprise to any elementary school educator that boys struggle with writing. The physical act of writing was so hard for Seth. He was only seven years old! It's not that the words weren't there: he just couldn't get his hand to form the letters quickly enough.
And so, due to his totally normal level of fine motor skill development, he was removed from the highest reading group. Now instead of being challenged by what he read, he was simply floating on by (and quite happy about the easier spelling words, to be honest). I was frustrated: was there no way to teach him at an individual level? To somehow accommodate his still-developing writing while challenging his reading comprehension? Nope. Everyone has to fit into a category, so they shoved him in where he "fit" best.
I saw this again with our frustrating new math curriculum. This program was incredibly reading-heavy. Almost every problem involved lengthy story problems as well as the command to "explain your answer." Suddenly kids who had long been in the highest math groups found themselves kicked out. Had their math skills suddenly faltered? Hardly. But math wasn't all that mattered anymore: now it was also reading. Shouldn't there be some way to do both? To let them keep leaping ahead with their understanding of math while simultaneously working to build their reading comprehension? Yes. Absolutely yes. But it wasn't happening anywhere that I could see. The teachers could barely keep up with the new curriculum as it was, much less work on individual adaptation.
I fully believe that the future of education is individual. I'm hoping for a world without grade levels--just levels of proficiency. My 9 year old could be at a 5th grade math level, an 8th grade reading level, and a 2nd grade writing and drawing level (curse those fine motor skills!). He could blast through decimals in two days but take a month to master simplifying fractions. If he suddenly discovered a burning desire to learn everything he can about WWII, he could take the time to study and read without "falling behind" in something.
I feel like this is a more natural learning method. Think of how you learn new things as an adult. Some things come quickly and naturally. Others you struggle with and have to take extra time and effort to master (this would be me with anything involving dance). And sometimes a topic or activity catches your attention and you spend six months reading everything you can find about life under Communist regimes (ask me how I know). I would have been extremely irritated if after a few weeks of reading someone took my books away and said, "Sorry! We have to move on to the next subject!" But that's what happens every day in the classroom to kids. Their learning is dictated by the clock and the calendar, not by interest or understanding.
Now that I've given all my reasons why we decided not to continue with public school this year, let me give you my reasons why we're excited to homeschool:
More Time for Fun
During the public school year I rarely had time to take my kids to the library. Evenings were full of other activities, as were weekends. We'd sneak in occasionally on an early-out day or a random holiday, but those were infrequent occurrences. Yes, they had library time at school. But my kindergartner was limited to one book a week. When we go to the public library she often checks out 15-20 books. Or every single book on snakes the library owns. One book isn't cutting it for her.One field trip a year wasn't cutting it either. It kills me to see my kids come home with worksheets about firemen when they could be visiting a fire station. Or filling out another packet of questions instead of visiting a museum. Yes, I know there's a cost involved. But maybe money might be better spent on field trips instead of purchasing brand new math curriculum every three years. Just a thought.
We try to go on field trips every week. We've been to a local estuary center. To a cave. To the library several times (we currently have around 75 books checked out). Our future plans include visiting the zoo, attending a reptile show, visiting a local farm and going to see a presentation on Native American dance. And that's just through November.
More Time for Work
During the school year I felt like most of my interactions with my children were to hurry them along. "Time to get up." "You need to eat quickly." "Run up and brush your hair." After school was no better. "Do you have any homework?" "Have you practiced piano?" "Are your chores done?" It was rush before school and constant pestering after.Now my kids do their chores in the morning before we start school. Or during a break in our school day. There's more time to teach them how to do complicated chores like helping make breakfast or cleaning the bathroom. I fully believe that these types of skills are just as necessary as the standard academic skills but I rarely had time to teach them properly. Now it's just part of our school day.
More Learning
One of my favorite parts of homeschooling is the fact that learning opportunities are literally everywhere. Where did that fruit at the store originally come from? Why is the sidewalk in front of our house cracking? What is Labor Day celebrating? See a billboard for a strange/cool/interesting thing while you're driving? Pull on over!
Obviously these are not things that only homeschoolers notice. But we have the benefit of time. Time to explore things in depth. Time outside a classroom to notice things and take adventures when they're offered.
I'm also working hard this year on giving my children opportunities for self-guided (or "delight-directed") learning. This is really hard for me since I love checklists and planning, but my kids need it. Seth has time to focus on his coding lessons or read book after book (after book, after book) on Greek mythology. Catherine can chase the butterflies in the yard and study the slugs under the drainpipe. We still cover our core subjects every day but that time to explore and learn what THEY want to learn makes school more wonderful for all of us.
More Choices
When I sent Seth off to school I had no say in what topics he would learn that year. That was all dictated at a county or state level and could not be individualized during elementary school.Homeschool, on the other hand, is almost infinitely customizable. Seth wanted to learn about coding so I found him a fantastic online course on Minecraft modding. He also wants to buy a snake so we did research about costs and care and put together a proposal for his dad (which is currently under review). Catherine is slightly obsessed with bugs and snakes so we've watched many, many documentaries together. She's also very creative and has been given free range with art supplies. Both kids are also learning Spanish, which isn't usually taught until middle or high school here.
We also lucked out and found a great co-op that meets twice a week. My kids will have classes in all the core subjects with the exception of math, which is left to the families. But they'll also have art classes, PE classes, geography classes, Spanish classes, literature classes, Home Ec classes, music classes, and (Seth's favorite) a class on how to build things. It's going to be an awesome year.
More Purpose
When my kids were at school I obviously had a lot more free time. Even with the little two at home I was able to make long lists of projects I wanted done. I painted most of the house. I made scrapbooks. I organized things. I cleaned things. I felt like I was accomplishing a lot.But then I'd realize that I hadn't read to Aaron all day. Or that he'd been playing on the iPad for hours while I caught up on our family blog. Or that I hadn't taken Elise to play outside in two days. My projects had become my purpose. My kids were just things that I had to distract so I could get projects done. That was not how I wanted to parent.
The idea of homeschooling again had been hanging out in the back of my mind ever since we stopped. But now it was louder. I knew that homeschooling would force my hand. My children wouldn't interfere with my projects: they would BE my projects. I would have to spend my time teaching them, planning for them, paying close attention to their interests and frustrations. That was the kind of parent I wanted to be!
Homeschooling is as much for me as it is for my kids. It allows us to spend more time together. It gives my little two time to play with and learn from my big two and my big two time to guide and teach the little two. It gives me back the time I felt I was quickly losing with my oldest as he got more independent and more involved in activities outside the home. Every morning we read a chapter or two aloud from a book, which has always been something I wanted to do. We have two scheduled recesses where the kids just get to go play outside together. Either Seth or Catherine is assigned to read books to Aaron every day. If we get done early we all go play outside or we play a game together.
Yes, we spend a LOT of time together. Yes, sometimes I have a headache by 6 pm and just want thirty minutes alone. Yes, my kids hate doing their math and whine when recess is over. They're still normal kids. It's a constant cycle of adapting, reevaluating, observing and adapting again until something works. But for now, it's exactly what we need.
I am fully aware that my kids will almost definitely end up back in public school eventually. Catherine especially seems to thrive in that atmosphere. If homeschooling isn't the best fit for her, I'm grateful to have an excellent public school for her to attend. There are many things (obviously) that I don't love about public school, but I'm also aware that almost everyone I know attended public school and most of those people lead happy and successful lives.
I'm also very hopeful that this won't come across as an attack on those who choose to send their kids to school. Sometimes we (as moms, especially) like to equate time spent with quality of parenting. So, since I'm homeschooling and spending WAY more time with my kids than most other moms, I'm obviously a better parent, right? Ha. Hahaha. What really matters is this and this alone: do what is right for your child and for your family. Public school. Private school. Homeschool. Boarding school. Unschooling. Don't ever let anyone make you feel inferior because you make different schooling choices than they do.
I also have friends who love the idea of homeschooling but are unable to because of various circumstances. I really am aware of how lucky I am to be in a situation where I can do this and I am very, very grateful. To those friends I would say: pretend you're homeschooling whenever you can! Weekends, days off school, summer, whenever! Since your kids are getting all their core subjects in school, you can use your time with them for the fun stuff: hiking, visiting aquariums and zoos, trying out a new instrument or computer program. Really it's just a matter of realizing that learning can happen anywhere and seeking out those opportunities. Some of the people who inspire me most aren't homeschoolers at all: they're just parents who intentionally make time for new experiences.
We are looking forward to a wonderful year of homeschooling. (Actually, I made my kids start school in June so there's no "looking forward." And yes, there was much whining). We're also hoping our friends, family and neighbors have a wonderful year at whatever schools you may be attending. I can gloat to you about not packing lunches or being a slave to the school calendar. You can gloat to me about going to the grocery store or doctor's office without all your kids in tow (worst part of homeschooling, for sure). May we all (parents, teachers, and kids) survive another year and still love each other when it's all done. Happy Back to School Day!
3 comments:
Beautifully stated. Amen!
I left right after you moved and put Seth in school. It’s nice to see that you have come back full circle. My favorite thing to learn was how many projects you got done that year of school and for you to step back and say that while I was good, it wasn’t what you wanted. I needed the reminder.
respect! https://www.fn92100.com/2020/11/pinjaman-online.html
Post a Comment